Title |
NBD delivery improves the disease phenotype of the golden retriever model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Skeletal Muscle, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/2044-5040-4-18 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joe N Kornegay, Jennifer M Peterson, Daniel J Bogan, William Kline, Janet R Bogan, Jennifer L Dow, Zheng Fan, Jiahui Wang, Mihye Ahn, Hongtu Zhu, Martin Styner, Denis C Guttridge |
Abstract |
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is caused by mutations in the dystrophin gene and afflicts skeletal and cardiac muscles. Previous studies showed that DMD is associated with constitutive activation of NF-κB, and in dystrophin-deficient mdx and utrophin/dystrophin (utrn (-/-) ;mdx) double knock out (dko) mouse models, inhibition of NF-κB with the Nemo Binding Domain (NBD) peptide led to significant improvements in both diaphragm and cardiac muscle function. A trial in golden retriever muscular dystrophy (GRMD) canine model of DMD was initiated with four primary outcomes: skeletal muscle function, MRI of pelvic limb muscles, histopathologic features of skeletal muscles, and safety. GRMD and wild type dogs at 2 months of age were treated for 4 months with NBD by intravenous infusions. Results were compared with those collected from untreated GRMD and wild type dogs through a separate, natural history study. Results showed that intravenous delivery of NBD in GRMD dogs led to a recovery of pelvic limb muscle force and improvement of histopathologic lesions. In addition, NBD-treated GRMD dogs had normalized postural changes and a trend towards lower tissue injury on magnetic resonance imaging. Despite this phenotypic improvement, NBD administration over time led to infusion reactions and an immune response in both treated GRMD and wild type dogs. This GRMD trial was beneficial both in providing evidence that NBD is efficacious in a large animal DMD model and in identifying potential safety concerns that will be informative moving forward with human trials. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 75% |
Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 34 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 28% |
Researcher | 4 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
Other | 6 | 17% |
Unknown | 6 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 28% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 11% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 8% |
Engineering | 2 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 9 | 25% |