Title |
Endothelial progenitor cells in ischemic stroke: an exploration from hypothesis to therapy
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Hematology & Oncology, April 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13045-015-0130-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ya-Feng Li, Li-Na Ren, Geng Guo, Lee Anne Cannella, Valeria Chernaya, Sonia Samuel, Su-Xuan Liu, Hong Wang, Xiao-Feng Yang |
Abstract |
As the population ages and lifestyles change in concordance, the number of patients suffering from ischemic stroke and its associated disabilities is increasing. Studies on determining the relationship between endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and ischemic stroke have become a new hot spot and have reported that EPCs may protect the brain against ischemic injury, promote neurovascular repair, and improve long-term neurobehavioral outcomes. More importantly, they introduce a new perspective for prognosis assessment and therapy of ischemic stroke. However, EPCs' origin, function, influence factors, injury repair mechanisms, and cell-based therapy strategies remain controversial. Particularly, research conducted to date has less clinical studies than pre-clinical experiments on animals. In this review, we summarized and analyzed the current understanding of basic characteristics, influence factors, functions, therapeutic strategies, and disadvantages of EPCs as well as the regulation of inflammatory factors involved in the function and survival of EPCs after ischemic stroke. Identifying potential therapeutic effects of EPCs in ischemic stroke will be a challenging but an incredibly important breakthrough in neurology, which may bring promise for patients with ischemic stroke. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Greece | 1 | 1% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 71 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 23% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
Researcher | 7 | 10% |
Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 15% |
Unknown | 17 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 23% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 18% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 15% |
Unknown | 22 | 30% |