↓ Skip to main content

A rapid and sensitive method for determination of carotenoids in plant tissues by high performance liquid chromatography

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Methods, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
401 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A rapid and sensitive method for determination of carotenoids in plant tissues by high performance liquid chromatography
Published in
Plant Methods, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13007-015-0051-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Prateek Gupta, Yellamaraju Sreelakshmi, Rameshwar Sharma

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 401 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 396 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 17%
Researcher 62 15%
Student > Master 55 14%
Student > Bachelor 44 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 4%
Other 58 14%
Unknown 99 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 142 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 10%
Chemistry 35 9%
Chemical Engineering 12 3%
Engineering 12 3%
Other 39 10%
Unknown 119 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2015.
All research outputs
#15,204,154
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#679
of 1,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,165
of 366,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#14
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.