You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
RapidArc, SmartArc and TomoHD compared with classical step and shoot and sliding window intensity modulated radiotherapy in an oropharyngeal cancer treatment plan comparison
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiation Oncology, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-717x-8-37 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dirk Van Gestel, Corine van Vliet-Vroegindeweij, Frank Van den Heuvel, Wouter Crijns, Ann Coelmont, Bie De Ost, Andrea Holt, Emmy Lamers, Yasmyne Geussens, Sandra Nuyts, Danielle Van den Weyngaert, Tim Van den Wyngaert, Jan B Vermorken, Vincent Gregoire |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Philippines | 1 | 1% |
| Greece | 1 | 1% |
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 15% |
| Researcher | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 19 | 26% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 41% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 15 | 20% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2018.
All research outputs
#7,554,098
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#432
of 2,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,899
of 193,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#12
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,072 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.