↓ Skip to main content

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for point-of-care detection of asymptomatic low-density malaria parasite carriers in Zanzibar

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) for point-of-care detection of asymptomatic low-density malaria parasite carriers in Zanzibar
Published in
Malaria Journal, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12936-015-0573-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jackie Cook, Berit Aydin-Schmidt, Iveth J González, David Bell, Elin Edlund, Majda H Nassor, Mwinyi Msellem, Abdullah Ali, Ali K Abass, Andreas Mårtensson, Anders Björkman

Abstract

Asymptomatic, low parasite density malaria infections are difficult to detect with currently available point-of-care diagnostics. This study piloted a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) kit for field-friendly, high-throughput detection of asymptomatic malaria infections during mass screening and treatment (MSAT) in Zanzibar, a malaria pre-elimination setting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Burkina Faso 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 197 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 21%
Student > Master 38 19%
Researcher 31 15%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 30 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 18%
Engineering 17 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 7%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 44 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2015.
All research outputs
#18,142,662
of 23,306,612 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#4,935
of 5,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,416
of 355,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#72
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,306,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.