↓ Skip to main content

Comparative metagenomics of biogas-producing microbial communities from production-scale biogas plants operating under wet or dry fermentation conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
153 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
227 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative metagenomics of biogas-producing microbial communities from production-scale biogas plants operating under wet or dry fermentation conditions
Published in
Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13068-014-0193-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yvonne Stolze, Martha Zakrzewski, Irena Maus, Felix Eikmeyer, Sebastian Jaenicke, Nils Rottmann, Clemens Siebner, Alfred Pühler, Andreas Schlüter

Abstract

Decomposition of biomass for biogas production can be practiced under wet and dry fermentation conditions. In contrast to the dry fermentation technology, wet fermentation is characterized by a high liquid content and a relatively low total solid content. In this study, the composition and functional potential of a biogas-producing microbial community in an agricultural biogas reactor operating under wet fermentation conditions was analyzed by a metagenomic approach applying 454-pyrosequencing. The obtained metagenomic dataset and corresponding 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequences were compared to the previously sequenced comparable metagenome from a dry fermentation process, meeting explicitly identical boundary conditions regarding sample and community DNA preparation, sequencing technology, processing of sequence reads and data analyses by bioinformatics tools.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Unknown 219 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 27%
Researcher 31 14%
Student > Master 20 9%
Student > Bachelor 19 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 38 17%
Unknown 42 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 26%
Environmental Science 33 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 12%
Engineering 14 6%
Chemical Engineering 9 4%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 59 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2015.
All research outputs
#14,599,900
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#741
of 1,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,459
of 362,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#23
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,578 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.