The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, April 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-7-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alison M McDonald, Rosemary C Knight, Marion K Campbell, Vikki A Entwistle, Adrian M Grant, Jonathan A Cook, Diana R Elbourne, David Francis, Jo Garcia, Ian Roberts, Claire Snowdon |
| Abstract |
A commonly reported problem with the conduct of multicentre randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is that recruitment is often slower or more difficult than expected, with many trials failing to reach their planned sample size within the timescale and funding originally envisaged. The aim of this study was to explore factors that may have been associated with good and poor recruitment in a cohort of multicentre trials funded by two public bodies: the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) and the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) Programme. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 527 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 511 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 105 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 86 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 74 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 46 | 9% |
| Other | 33 | 6% |
| Other | 83 | 16% |
| Unknown | 100 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 191 | 36% |
| Psychology | 36 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 24 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 3% |
| Other | 98 | 19% |
| Unknown | 129 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,138,576
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#45
of 45 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,811
of 87,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 45 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,267 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them