↓ Skip to main content

Perineural Resiniferatoxin Selectively Inhibits Inflammatory Hyperalgesia

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Pain, January 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perineural Resiniferatoxin Selectively Inhibits Inflammatory Hyperalgesia
Published in
Molecular Pain, January 2008
DOI 10.1186/1744-8069-4-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

John K Neubert, Andrew J Mannes, Laszlo J Karai, Alan C Jenkins, Lanel Zawatski, Mones Abu-Asab, Michael J Iadarola

Abstract

Resiniferatoxin (RTX) is an ultrapotent capsaicin analog that binds to the transient receptor potential channel, vanilloid subfamily member 1 (TRPV1). There is a large body of evidence supporting a role for TRPV1 in noxious-mediated and inflammatory hyperalgesic responses. In this study, we evaluated low, graded, doses of perineural RTX as a method for regional pain control. We hypothesized that this approach can provide long-term, but reversible, blockade of a portion of nociceptive afferent fibers within peripheral nerves when given at a site remote from the neuronal perikarya in the dorsal root ganglia. Following perineural RTX application to the sciatic nerve, we demonstrated a significant inhibition of inflammatory nociception that was dose- and time-dependent. At the same time, treated animals maintained normal proprioceptive sensations and motor control, and other nociceptive responses were largely unaffected. Using a range of mechanical and thermal algesic tests, we found that the most sensitive measure following perineural RTX administration was inhibition of inflammatory hyperalgesia. Recovery studies showed that physiologic sensory function could return as early as two weeks post-RTX treatment, however, immunohistochemical examination of the DRG revealed a partial, but significant reduction in the number of the TRPV1-positive neurons. We propose that this method could represent a beneficial treatment for a range of chronic pain problems, including neuropathic and inflammatory pain not responding to other therapies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 29%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 12 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 8%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 12 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Pain
#595
of 669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,772
of 168,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Pain
#22
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.