↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a group-based pain self-management intervention for patients undergoing total hip replacement: feasibility study for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a group-based pain self-management intervention for patients undergoing total hip replacement: feasibility study for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, May 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-176
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vikki Wylde, Elsa Marques, Neil Artz, Ashley Blom, Rachael Gooberman-Hill

Abstract

Total hip replacement (THR) is a common elective surgical procedure and can be effective for reducing chronic pain. However, waiting times can be considerable. A pain self-management intervention may provide patients with skills to more effectively manage their pain and its impact during their wait for surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a randomized controlled trial to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a group-based pain self-management course for patients undergoing THR.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 192 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 20%
Researcher 20 10%
Student > Bachelor 20 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 8%
Other 27 14%
Unknown 57 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 19%
Psychology 14 7%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 62 32%