You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A gait abnormality measure based on root mean square of trunk acceleration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-10-118 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Masaki Sekine, Toshiyo Tamura, Masaki Yoshida, Yuki Suda, Yuichi Kimura, Hiroaki Miyoshi, Yoshifumi Kijima, Yuji Higashi, Toshiro Fujimoto |
| Abstract |
Root mean square (RMS) of trunk acceleration is seen frequently in gait analysis research. However, many studies have reported that the RMS value was related to walking speed. Therefore, the relationship between the RMS value and walking speed should be considered when the RMS value is used to assess gait abnormality. We hypothesized that the RMS values in three sensing axes exhibit common proportions for healthy people if they walk at their own preferred speed and that the RMS proportions in abnormal gait deviate from the common proportions. In this study, we proposed the RMS ratio (RMSR) as a gait abnormality measure and verified its ability to discriminate abnormal gait. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 174 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 18% |
| Researcher | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 16% |
| Unknown | 30 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 34 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 16% |
| Sports and Recreations | 28 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Unknown | 45 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2015.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#1,091
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#244,944
of 320,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.