You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
New structural analogues of curcumin exhibit potent growth suppressive activity in human colorectal carcinoma cells
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Cancer, March 2009
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2407-9-99 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ling Cen, Brian Hutzen, Sarah Ball, Stephanie DeAngelis, Chun-Liang Chen, James R Fuchs, Chenglong Li, Pui-Kai Li, Jiayuh Lin |
Abstract |
Colorectal carcinoma is one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in the Western World. Novel therapeutic approaches are needed for colorectal carcinoma. Curcumin, the active component and yellow pigment of turmeric, has been reported to have several anti-cancer activities including anti-proliferation, anti-invasion, and anti-angiogenesis. Clinical trials have suggested that curcumin may serve as a potential preventive or therapeutic agent for colorectal cancer. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
India | 1 | 2% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 52 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 25% |
Student > Master | 10 | 18% |
Researcher | 5 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 16% |
Unknown | 9 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 22% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 18% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 15% |
Chemistry | 6 | 11% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 8 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2015.
All research outputs
#18,401,176
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#5,419
of 8,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,888
of 92,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#26
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,294 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.