↓ Skip to main content

A qualitative study exploring the determinants of maternal health service uptake in post-conflict Burundi and Northern Uganda

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
408 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A qualitative study exploring the determinants of maternal health service uptake in post-conflict Burundi and Northern Uganda
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12884-015-0449-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Primus Che Chi, Patience Bulage, Henrik Urdal, Johanne Sundby

Abstract

BackgroundArmed conflict has been described as an important contributor to the social determinants of health and a driver of health inequity, including maternal health. These conflicts may severely reduce access to maternal health services and, as a consequence, lead to poor maternal health outcomes for a period extending beyond the conflict itself. As such, understanding how maternal health-seeking behaviour and utilisation of maternal health services can be improved in post-conflict societies is of crucial importance. This study aims to explore the determinants (barriers and facilitators) of women¿s uptake of maternal, sexual and reproductive health services (MSRHS) in two post-conflict settings in sub-Saharan Africa; Burundi and Northern Uganda, and how uptake is affected by exposure to armed conflict.MethodsThis is a qualitative study that utilised in-depth interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs) for data collection. One hundred and fifteen participants took part in the interviews and FGDs across the two study settings. Participants were women of reproductive age, local health providers and staff of non-governmental organizations. Issues explored included the factors affecting women¿s utilisation of a range of MSRHS vis-à-vis conflict exposure. The framework method, making use of both inductive and deductive approaches, was used for analyzing the data.ResultsA complex and inter-related set of factors affect women¿s utilisation of MSRHS in post-conflict settings. Exposure to armed conflict affects women¿s utilisation of these services mainly through impeding women¿s health seeking behaviour and community perception of health services. The factors identified cut across the individual, socio-cultural, and political and health system spheres, and the main determinants include women¿s fear of developing pregnancy-related complications, status of women empowerment and support at the household and community levels, removal of user-fees, proximity to the health facility, and attitude of health providers.ConclusionsImproving women¿s uptake of MSRHS in post-conflict settings requires health system strengthening initiatives that address the barriers across the individual, socio-cultural, and political and health system spheres. While addressing financial barriers to access is crucial, attention should be paid to non-financial barriers as well. The goal should be to develop an equitable and sustainable health system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 408 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 404 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 90 22%
Researcher 47 12%
Student > Bachelor 47 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 10%
Student > Postgraduate 21 5%
Other 63 15%
Unknown 101 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 82 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 71 17%
Social Sciences 55 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Other 60 15%
Unknown 121 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2017.
All research outputs
#1,727,407
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#428
of 4,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,376
of 352,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#10
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.