↓ Skip to main content

Comparative analysis of sugarcane bagasse metagenome reveals unique and conserved biomass-degrading enzymes among lignocellulolytic microbial communities

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative analysis of sugarcane bagasse metagenome reveals unique and conserved biomass-degrading enzymes among lignocellulolytic microbial communities
Published in
Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13068-015-0200-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wuttichai Mhuantong, Varodom Charoensawan, Pattanop Kanokratana, Sithichoke Tangphatsornruang, Verawat Champreda

Abstract

As one of the most abundant agricultural wastes, sugarcane bagasse is largely under-exploited, but it possesses a great potential for the biofuel, fermentation, and cellulosic biorefinery industries. It also provides a unique ecological niche, as the microbes in this lignocellulose-rich environment thrive in relatively high temperatures (50°C) with varying microenvironments of aerobic surface to anoxic interior. The microbial community in bagasse thus presents a good resource for the discovery and characterization of new biomass-degrading enzymes; however, it remains largely unexplored.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 3%
Canada 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 137 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 17%
Student > Master 22 15%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 30 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 24%
Engineering 4 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Environmental Science 3 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 37 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2015.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#997
of 1,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,976
of 362,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#26
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,578 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.