↓ Skip to main content

High-throughput sequencing of nematode communities from total soil DNA extractions

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High-throughput sequencing of nematode communities from total soil DNA extractions
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12898-014-0034-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rumakanta Sapkota, Mogens Nicolaisen

Abstract

Nematodes are extremely diverse and numbers of species are predicted to be more than a million. Studies on nematode diversity are difficult and laborious using classical methods and therefore high-throughput sequencing is an attractive alternative. Primers that have been used in previous sequence-based studies are not nematode specific but also amplify other groups of organisms such as fungi and plantae, and thus require a nematode enrichment step that may introduce biases. In this study an amplification strategy which selectively amplifies a fragment of the SSU from nematodes without the need for enrichment was developed. Using this strategy on DNA templates from a set of 22 agricultural soils, we obtained 64.4% sequences of nematode origin in total, whereas the remaining sequences were almost entirely from other metazoans. The nematode sequences were derived from a broad taxonomic range and most sequences were from nematode taxa that have previously been found to be abundant in soil such as Tylenchida, Rhabditida, Dorylaimida, Triplonchida and Araeolaimida. Our amplification and sequencing strategy for assessing nematode diversity was able to collect a broad diversity without prior nematode enrichment and thus the method will be highly valuable in ecological studies of nematodes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Unknown 170 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 20%
Student > Master 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 7 4%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 40 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 11%
Environmental Science 13 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 47 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2015.
All research outputs
#7,008,147
of 25,405,598 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,572
of 3,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,353
of 367,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#31
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,405,598 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,713 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.