↓ Skip to main content

Long term follow-up to evaluate the efficacy of miglustat treatment in Italian patients with Niemann-Pick disease type C

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long term follow-up to evaluate the efficacy of miglustat treatment in Italian patients with Niemann-Pick disease type C
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13023-015-0240-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simona Fecarotta, Alfonso Romano, Roberto Della Casa, Ennio Del Giudice, Diana Bruschini, Giuseppina Mansi, Bruno Bembi, Andrea Dardis, Agata Fiumara, Maja Di Rocco, Graziella Uziel, Anna Ardissone, Dario Roccatello, Mirella Alpa, Enrico Bertini, Adele D’Amico, Carlo Dionisi-Vici, Federica Deodato, Stefania Caviglia, Antonio Federico, Silvia Palmeri, Orazio Gabrielli, Lucia Santoro, Alessandro Filla, Cinzia Russo, Giancarlo Parenti, Generoso Andria

Abstract

Twenty-five patients with Niemann Pick disease type C (age range: 7 months to 44 years) were enrolled in an Italian independent multicenter trial and treated with miglustat for periods from 48 to 96 months. Based on the age at onset of neurological manifestations patients' phenotypes were classified as: adult (n = 6), juvenile (n = 9), late infantile (n = 6), early infantile (n = 2). Two patients had an exclusively visceral phenotype. We clinically evaluated patients' neurological involvement, giving a score of severity ranging from 0 (best) to 3 (worst) for gait abnormalities, dystonia, dysmetria, dysarthria, and developmental delay/cognitive impairment, and from 0 to 4 for dysphagia. We calculated a mean composite severity score transforming the original scores proportionally to range from 0 to 1 to summarize the clinical picture of patients and monitor their clinical course. We compared the results after 24 months of treatment in 23 patients showing neurological manifestations. Stabilization or improvement of all parameters was observed in the majority of patients. With the exception of developmental delay/cognitive impairment, these results persisted after 48-96 months in 41 - 55% of the patients (dystonia: 55%, dysarthria: 50%, gait abnormalities: 43%, dysmetria: 41%, respectively). After 24 months of therapy the majority of the evaluable patients (n = 20), demonstrated a stabilization or improvement in the ability to swallow four substances of different consistency (water: 65%, purée: 58%, little pasta: 60%, biscuit: 55%). These results persisted after 48-96 months in 40-50% of patients, with the exception of water swallowing. Stabilization or improvement of the composite severity score was detected in the majority (57%) of 7 patients who were treated early (within 3.5 years from onset) and rarely in patients who received treatment later. The results of this study suggest that miglustat treatment can improve or stabilize neurological manifestations, at least for a period of time; the severity of clinical conditions at the beginning of treatment can influence the rate of disease progression. This conclusion applies particularly to patients with juvenile or adult onset of the disease. EudraCT number 2006-005842-35.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 110 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 13 12%
Researcher 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Master 10 9%
Other 26 23%
Unknown 33 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 28%
Neuroscience 10 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 6%
Psychology 5 4%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 35 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2018.
All research outputs
#6,731,052
of 22,793,427 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#921
of 2,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,055
of 255,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#17
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,793,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.