↓ Skip to main content

Effect of providing risk information on undergoing cervical cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Public Health, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of providing risk information on undergoing cervical cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Archives of Public Health, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13690-014-0055-7
Authors

Hiroyuki Fujiwara, Akihiro Shimoda, Yoshiki Ishikawa, Akiyo Taneichi, Mai Ohashi, Yoshifumi Takahashi, Takahiro Koyanagi, Hiroyuki Morisawa, Suzuyo Takahashi, Naoto Sato, Shizuo Machida, Yuji Takei, Yasushi Saga, Mitsuaki Suzuki

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 5 29%
Student > Master 4 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 18%
Social Sciences 2 12%
Unspecified 1 6%
Philosophy 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 6 35%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2015.
All research outputs
#2,555,726
of 4,814,322 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Public Health
#117
of 145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,110
of 143,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Public Health
#13
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,814,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 145 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.