↓ Skip to main content

Deciphering chicken gut microbial dynamics based on high-throughput 16S rRNA metagenomics analyses

Overview of attention for article published in Gut Pathogens, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
228 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
299 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deciphering chicken gut microbial dynamics based on high-throughput 16S rRNA metagenomics analyses
Published in
Gut Pathogens, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13099-015-0051-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohd Asrore Mohd Shaufi, Chin Chin Sieo, Chun Wie Chong, Han Ming Gan, Yin Wan Ho

Abstract

Chicken gut microbiota has paramount roles in host performance, health and immunity. Understanding the topological difference in gut microbial community composition is crucial to provide knowledge on the functions of each members of microbiota to the physiological maintenance of the host. The gut microbiota profiling of the chicken was commonly performed previously using culture-dependent and early culture-independent methods which had limited coverage and accuracy. Advances in technology based on next-generation sequencing (NGS), offers unparalleled coverage and depth in determining microbial gut dynamics. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the ileal and caecal microbiota development as chicken aged, which is important for future effective gut modulation.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 299 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 292 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 21%
Student > Master 44 15%
Researcher 39 13%
Student > Bachelor 18 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 5%
Other 49 16%
Unknown 70 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 122 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 20 7%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 19 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 1%
Other 22 7%
Unknown 78 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2015.
All research outputs
#7,037,962
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from Gut Pathogens
#136
of 538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,820
of 256,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gut Pathogens
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,801 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.