↓ Skip to main content

Elevated neck circumference and associated factors in adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Elevated neck circumference and associated factors in adolescents
Published in
BMC Public Health, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-1517-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberta de Lucena Ferretti, Isa de Pádua Cintra, Maria Aparecida Zanetti Passos, Gerson Luis de Moraes Ferrari, Mauro Fisberg

Abstract

Upper body subcutaneous fat, estimated by neck circumference (NC), may present greater metabolic risk than visceral fat. The aim of this study was to determine cutoff values for NC in adolescents that identify overweight and obesity, the prevalence of elevated NC, and its association with associated factors. Cross-sectional study with adolescents from public schools in São Paulo. Anthropometric variables, blood pressure and pubertal stage were collected. Cutoff values for NC were determined by Receiver Operating Characteristic curves. A binary logistic regression was used to determine relationships between NC and associated factors. Among 1668 adolescents studied, 54.92% were female. The cutoff values of NC in girls and boys that identified overweight were 31.25 and 34.25 cm, and obesity, 32.65 and 37.95 cm, respectively, and the prevalence of adolescents with high NC was 32.63% in females and 37.63% among males. NC for overweight was observed that there was an association with sex, weight, body mass index, arm, waist and thigh circumferences, pubertal stages and body fat percent (BF%). NC for obesity was found association with gender, weight, arm and thigh circumferences, and BF% (p < 0.001). It was concluded that there is high prevalence of elevated NC and higher risks for this outcome considering overweight and obesity, sex, weight, arm and thigh circumferences, BF%, besides being an easy and simple measure for use in clinical practice.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 133 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Student > Postgraduate 13 10%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 39 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Sports and Recreations 5 4%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 40 30%