You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Optimizing muscle power after stroke: a cross-sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-9-67 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Verna A Stavric, Peter J McNair |
| Abstract |
Stroke remains a leading cause of disability worldwide and results in muscle performance deficits and limitations in activity performance. Rehabilitation aims to address muscle dysfunction in an effort to improve activity and participation. While muscle strength has an impact on activity performance, muscle power has recently been acknowledged as contributing significantly to activity performance in this population. Therefore, rehabilitation efforts should include training of muscle power. However, little is known about what training parameters, or load, optimize muscle power performance in people with stroke. The purpose of this study was to investigate lower limb muscle power performance at differing loads in people with and without stroke. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 17 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 12% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 9% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 24 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2022.
All research outputs
#14,958,072
of 25,646,963 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#680
of 1,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,111
of 191,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,646,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.