↓ Skip to main content

Socioeconomic status and environmental noise exposure in Montreal, Canada

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Socioeconomic status and environmental noise exposure in Montreal, Canada
Published in
BMC Public Health, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12889-015-1571-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura M Dale, Sophie Goudreau, Stephane Perron, Martina S Ragettli, Marianne Hatzopoulou, Audrey Smargiassi

Abstract

This study's objective was to determine whether socioeconomically deprived populations are exposed to greater levels of environmental noise. Indicators of socioeconomic status were correlated with LAeq24h noise levels estimated with a land-use regression model at a small geographic scale. We found that noise exposure was associated with all socioeconomic indicators, with the strongest correlations found for median household income, proportion of people who spend over 30% of their income on housing, proportion of people below the low income boundary and with a social deprivation index combining several socio-economic variables. Our results were inconsistent with a number of studies performed elsewhere, indicating that locally conducted studies are imperative to assessing whether this double burden of noise exposure and low socioeconomic status exists in other contexts. The primary implication of our study is that noise exposure represents an environmental injustice in Montreal, which is an issue that merits both investigation and concern.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Unknown 96 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 18%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Professor 5 5%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 25 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 12%
Social Sciences 11 11%
Environmental Science 10 10%
Engineering 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 35 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2024.
All research outputs
#959,460
of 25,362,278 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,043
of 17,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,892
of 270,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#20
of 288 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,362,278 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,490 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 288 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.