↓ Skip to main content

Limitation of life support techniques at admission to the intensive care unit: a multicenter prospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Intensive Care, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Limitation of life support techniques at admission to the intensive care unit: a multicenter prospective cohort study
Published in
Journal of Intensive Care, April 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40560-018-0283-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olga Rubio, Anna Arnau, Sílvia Cano, Carles Subirà, Begoña Balerdi, María Eugenía Perea, Miguel Fernández-Vivas, María Barber, Noemí Llamas, Susana Altaba, Ana Prieto, Vicente Gómez, Mar Martin, Marta Paz, Belen Quesada, Valentí Español, Juan Carlos Montejo, José Manuel Gomez, Gloria Miro, Judith Xirgú, Ana Ortega, Pedro Rascado, Juan María Sánchez, Alfredo Marcos, Ana Tizon, Pablo Monedero, Elisabeth Zabala, Cristina Murcia, Ines Torrejon, Kenneth Planas, José Manuel Añon, Gonzalo Hernandez, María-del-Mar Fernandez, Consuelo Guía, Vanesa Arauzo, José Miguel Perez, Rosa Catalan, Javier Gonzalez, Rosa Poyo, Roser Tomas, Iñaki Saralegui, Jordi Mancebo, Charles Sprung, Rafael Fernández

Abstract

To determine the frequency of limitations on life support techniques (LLSTs) on admission to intensive care units (ICU), factors associated, and 30-day survival in patients with LLST on ICU admission. This prospective observational study included all patients admitted to 39 ICUs in a 45-day period in 2011. We recorded hospitals' characteristics (availability of intermediate care units, usual availability of ICU beds, and financial model) and patients' characteristics (demographics, reason for admission, functional status, risk of death, and LLST on ICU admission (withholding/withdrawing; specific techniques affected)). The primary outcome was 30-day survival for patients with LLST on ICU admission. Statistical analysis included multilevel logistic regression models. We recruited 3042 patients (age 62.5 ± 16.1 years). Most ICUs (94.8%) admitted patients with LLST, but only 238 (7.8% [95% CI 7.0-8.8]) patients had LLST on ICU admission; this group had higher ICU mortality (44.5 vs. 9.4% in patients without LLST; p < 0.001). Multilevel logistic regression showed a contextual effect of the hospital in LLST on ICU admission (median OR = 2.30 [95% CI 1.59-2.96]) and identified the following patient-related variables as independent factors associated with LLST on ICU admission: age, reason for admission, risk of death, and functional status. In patients with LLST on ICU admission, 30-day survival was 38% (95% CI 31.7-44.5). Factors associated with survival were age, reason for admission, risk of death, and number of reasons for LLST on ICU admission. The frequency of ICU admission with LLST is low but probably increasing; nearly one third of these patients survive for ≥ 30 days.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 20%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 23 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 18%
Engineering 4 5%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 27 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,532,645
of 24,276,163 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#121
of 546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,815
of 331,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,276,163 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 546 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.