↓ Skip to main content

Predictors for outcome among cardiac arrest patients: the importance of initial cardiac arrest rhythm versus time to return of spontaneous circulation, a retrospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Emergency Medicine, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predictors for outcome among cardiac arrest patients: the importance of initial cardiac arrest rhythm versus time to return of spontaneous circulation, a retrospective cohort study
Published in
BMC Emergency Medicine, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12873-015-0028-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ida Wibrandt, Kristine Norsted, Henrik Schmidt, Jens Schierbeck

Abstract

BackgroundIn the past decade, early treatment of cardiac arrest (CA) victims has been improved in several ways, leading to more optimistic over all prognoses. However, the global survival rate after out-of-hospital CA (OHCA) is still not more than 5-10%. With a better knowledge of the predictors for outcome among CA patients, we can improve the management of CA, in order to strengthen the leads in the chain of survival.MethodsA retrospective cohort study including 172 CA patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) in Odense University Hospital (OUH) in a three-year period was conducted. We determined the 90-day mortality and neurological outcome at discharge for CA patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia (TH), in regard to determine the importance of the predictors for mortality and neurological outcome, with emphasize on combining initial rhythm and time to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).ResultsThe overall mortality was 44% and a favorable neurological outcome was seen among 52%. Strong predictors for survival and favorable neurological outcome were ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation (VT/VF) as initial rhythm, cardiac etiology and time to ROSC¿<¿20 minutes. Age¿<¿60 years was a predictor for survival only. Patients with the combination of VT/VF and ROSC¿<¿20 minutes had undeniably the best chance of both survival and a favorable neurological outcome.ConclusionsWe found significant predictors for both survival and neurological outcome, in which an initial rhythm of VT/VF and a cardiac etiology were the strongest.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 111 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 18%
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Master 17 15%
Other 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 19 17%
Unknown 23 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 54%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Unspecified 1 <1%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 30 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2017.
All research outputs
#20,784,866
of 23,390,392 outputs
Outputs from BMC Emergency Medicine
#669
of 773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,615
of 355,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Emergency Medicine
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,390,392 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.