You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Framework and indicator testing protocol for developing and piloting quality indicators for the UK quality and outcomes framework
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Primary Care, August 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2296-12-85 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stephen M Campbell, Evangelos Kontopantelis, Kerin Hannon, Martyn Burke, Annette Barber, Helen E Lester |
Abstract |
Quality measures should be subjected to a testing protocol before being used in practice using key attributes such as acceptability, feasibility and reliability, as well as identifying issues derived from actual implementation and unintended consequences. We describe the methodologies and results of an indicator testing protocol (ITP) using data from proposed quality indicators for the United Kingdom Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 143 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 31 | 21% |
Student > Master | 30 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 10% |
Other | 14 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 8% |
Other | 24 | 16% |
Unknown | 22 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 70 | 47% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 7% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 5% |
Psychology | 5 | 3% |
Other | 15 | 10% |
Unknown | 27 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2011.
All research outputs
#16,722,913
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#1,612
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,140
of 131,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#19
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.