↓ Skip to main content

Family caregiver challenges in dementia care in Australia and China: a critical perspective

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Geriatrics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Family caregiver challenges in dementia care in Australia and China: a critical perspective
Published in
BMC Geriatrics, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2318-14-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lily Dongxia Xiao, Jing Wang, Guo-Ping He, Anita De Bellis, Jenny Verbeeck, Helena Kyriazopoulos

Abstract

Both Australia and China have a large proportion of people with dementia and the prevalence will triple in Australia and increase five times in China by 2050. The majority of people with dementia are reliant on family caregivers to provide daily care and to maintain the dignity in both countries. As a consequence, caregiver burden has become a major concern because of the negative impact on the care recipients' and the caregivers' health. It is strongly recommended that cross-national collaboration should be conducted to share experiences in fighting dementia. The aim of this study was to compare socially and culturally constructed enablers and barriers pertinent to dementia caregivers in one capital city in Australia and one capital city in China through critical reflection on the caregivers' subjective and objective experiences for the improvement of dementia care services in both countries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 174 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 17%
Student > Master 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 50 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 37 21%
Social Sciences 22 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 12%
Psychology 20 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 52 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2015.
All research outputs
#6,281,235
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#1,549
of 3,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,441
of 305,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#8
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,180 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.