↓ Skip to main content

Identification of conserved gene expression features between murine mammary carcinoma models and human breast tumors

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology (Online Edition), January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
969 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
811 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
connotea
3 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of conserved gene expression features between murine mammary carcinoma models and human breast tumors
Published in
Genome Biology (Online Edition), January 2007
DOI 10.1186/gb-2007-8-5-r76
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason I Herschkowitz, Karl Simin, Victor J Weigman, Igor Mikaelian, Jerry Usary, Zhiyuan Hu, Karen E Rasmussen, Laundette P Jones, Shahin Assefnia, Subhashini Chandrasekharan, Michael G Backlund, Yuzhi Yin, Andrey I Khramtsov, Roy Bastein, John Quackenbush, Robert I Glazer, Powel H Brown, Jeffrey E Green, Levy Kopelovich, Priscilla A Furth, Juan P Palazzo, Olufunmilayo I Olopade, Philip S Bernard, Gary A Churchill, Terry Van Dyke, Charles M Perou

Abstract

Although numerous mouse models of breast carcinomas have been developed, we do not know the extent to which any faithfully represent clinically significant human phenotypes. To address this need, we characterized mammary tumor gene expression profiles from 13 different murine models using DNA microarrays and compared the resulting data to those from human breast tumors.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 811 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 1%
United Kingdom 8 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 778 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 209 26%
Researcher 124 15%
Student > Master 109 13%
Student > Bachelor 78 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 49 6%
Other 133 16%
Unknown 109 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 274 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 200 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 120 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 28 3%
Chemistry 12 1%
Other 51 6%
Unknown 126 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,755,461
of 23,245,494 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#2,125
of 4,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,377
of 158,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology (Online Edition)
#22
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,245,494 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.