↓ Skip to main content

Identification of conserved gene expression features between murine mammary carcinoma models and human breast tumors

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

1 blog
5 patents


1012 Dimensions

Readers on

873 Mendeley
3 CiteULike
3 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Identification of conserved gene expression features between murine mammary carcinoma models and human breast tumors
Published in
Genome Biology, May 2007
DOI 10.1186/gb-2007-8-5-r76
Pubmed ID

Jason I Herschkowitz, Karl Simin, Victor J Weigman, Igor Mikaelian, Jerry Usary, Zhiyuan Hu, Karen E Rasmussen, Laundette P Jones, Shahin Assefnia, Subhashini Chandrasekharan, Michael G Backlund, Yuzhi Yin, Andrey I Khramtsov, Roy Bastein, John Quackenbush, Robert I Glazer, Powel H Brown, Jeffrey E Green, Levy Kopelovich, Priscilla A Furth, Juan P Palazzo, Olufunmilayo I Olopade, Philip S Bernard, Gary A Churchill, Terry Van Dyke, Charles M Perou


Although numerous mouse models of breast carcinomas have been developed, we do not know the extent to which any faithfully represent clinically significant human phenotypes. To address this need, we characterized mammary tumor gene expression profiles from 13 different murine models using DNA microarrays and compared the resulting data to those from human breast tumors.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 873 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 1%
United Kingdom 8 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 840 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 215 25%
Researcher 128 15%
Student > Master 110 13%
Student > Bachelor 81 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 52 6%
Other 135 15%
Unknown 152 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 275 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 211 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 124 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 29 3%
Chemistry 13 1%
Other 49 6%
Unknown 172 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2022.
All research outputs
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 85,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.