You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Plant phenotyping: from bean weighing to image analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-015-0056-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Achim Walter, Frank Liebisch, Andreas Hund |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 27% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 47% |
| Scientists | 4 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 625 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 610 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 109 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 108 | 17% |
| Researcher | 97 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 55 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 5% |
| Other | 88 | 14% |
| Unknown | 137 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 283 | 45% |
| Engineering | 51 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 31 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 29 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 25 | 4% |
| Other | 39 | 6% |
| Unknown | 167 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2018.
All research outputs
#4,350,574
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#238
of 1,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,363
of 276,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#7
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,289 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,574 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.