You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Bacillus BioBrick Box: generation and evaluation of essential genetic building blocks for standardized work with Bacillus subtilis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biological Engineering, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1754-1611-7-29 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jara Radeck, Korinna Kraft, Julia Bartels, Tamara Cikovic, Franziska Dürr, Jennifer Emenegger, Simon Kelterborn, Christopher Sauer, Georg Fritz, Susanne Gebhard, Thorsten Mascher |
| Abstract |
Standardized and well-characterized genetic building blocks are a prerequisite for the convenient and reproducible assembly of novel genetic modules and devices. While numerous standardized parts exist for Escherichia coli, such tools are still missing for the Gram-positive model organism Bacillus subtilis. The goal of this study was to develop and thoroughly evaluate such a genetic toolbox. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 398 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 389 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 94 | 24% |
| Researcher | 60 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 54 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 52 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 41 | 10% |
| Unknown | 85 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 122 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 118 | 30% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 11 | 3% |
| Engineering | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 7% |
| Unknown | 95 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2020.
All research outputs
#5,944,738
of 22,994,508 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Engineering
#95
of 265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,541
of 308,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Engineering
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,994,508 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 265 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.