You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Postoperative pneumonia following cardiac surgery in non-ventilated patients versus mechanically ventilated patients: is there any difference?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, December 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-015-0845-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nicolas Allou, Jerome Allyn, Aurélie Snauwaert, Camille Welsch, Jean Christophe Lucet, Rita Kortbaoui, Mathieu Desmard, Pascal Augustin, Philippe Montravers |
Abstract |
No studies have compared ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and non-VAP following cardiac surgery (CS). The aim of this study was to assess the incidence, clinical and microbiologic features, treatment characteristics and prognosis of postoperative pneumonia following CS with a special focus on non-VAP. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
Puerto Rico | 2 | 13% |
Greece | 1 | 7% |
Turkey | 1 | 7% |
Spain | 1 | 7% |
Japan | 1 | 7% |
France | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 47% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 40% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 68 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 13% |
Other | 8 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
Lecturer | 5 | 7% |
Other | 16 | 23% |
Unknown | 16 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 45% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 22 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2015.
All research outputs
#3,905,172
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,746
of 6,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,471
of 387,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#332
of 575 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 575 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.