You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A comparison of clinical characteristics between adolescent males and females with eating disorders
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, March 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12888-015-0419-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elisabeth Welch, Ata Ghaderi, Ingemar Swenne |
Abstract |
Eating disorders (ED) are serious disorders that have a negative impact on both the psychological and the physiological well-being of the afflicted. Despite the fact that ED affect both genders, males are often underrepresented in research and when included the sample sizes are often too small for separate analyses. Consequently we have an unclear and sometimes contradictory picture of the clinical characteristics of males with ED. The aim of the present study was to improve our understanding of the clinical features of adolescent males with eating disorders. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 7 | 35% |
Canada | 2 | 10% |
United States | 1 | 5% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 16 | 80% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 162 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 31 | 19% |
Researcher | 19 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 11% |
Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 7% |
Other | 29 | 18% |
Unknown | 37 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 43 | 26% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 23% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Other | 14 | 9% |
Unknown | 42 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2016.
All research outputs
#2,772,238
of 24,164,942 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#1,045
of 5,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,664
of 263,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#16
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,164,942 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.