You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comprehensive SDG goal and targets for non-communicable diseases and mental health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13033-015-0003-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Harry Minas, Atsuro Tsutsumi, Takashi Izutsu, Kathryn Goetzke, Graham Thornicroft |
| Abstract |
The negotiations on the SDG goals and targets, leading to the sustainable development Declaration in September 2015, are now in the final stages. Ensuring that people with mental disorders are not left behind in the global development program from 2015 to 2030 will require specific and explicit commitments and targets against which progress in mental health can be measured and reported. The arguments for inclusion of explicit mental health targets in the SDGs are compelling. The final negotiations on the SDG goals and targets will now determine whether people with mental illness and psychosocial disabilities will continue to be neglected or will benefit equitably from inclusion in the post-2015 development program. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 23% |
| Brazil | 1 | 8% |
| Togo | 1 | 8% |
| South Africa | 1 | 8% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 8% |
| Ghana | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 85% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 15% |
| Researcher | 18 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 33 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 12% |
| Psychology | 13 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 19% |
| Unknown | 38 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2016.
All research outputs
#3,040,918
of 24,985,232 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#158
of 750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,862
of 264,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,985,232 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 750 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.