You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Brief Memory and Executive Test (BMET) for detecting vascular cognitive impairment in small vessel disease: a validation study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-015-0290-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rebecca L Brookes, Matthew J Hollocks, Usman Khan, Robin G Morris, Hugh S Markus |
| Abstract |
Cognitive impairment is common in patients with cerebral small vessel disease, but is not well detected using common cognitive screening tests which have been primarily devised for cortical dementias. We developed the Brief Memory and Executive Test (BMET); a rapid screening measure sensitive to the impaired executive function and processing speed characteristic of small vessel disease (SVD). To assess the BMET's validity for general use, we evaluated it when administered by non-psychologists in a multicentre study and collected control data to derive normative scores. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 14% |
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 25 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 26 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 24% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 29 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2015.
All research outputs
#14,805,023
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#2,987
of 3,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,177
of 259,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#76
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.