↓ Skip to main content

Explicit and implicit information needs of people with depression: a qualitative investigation of problems reported on an online depression support forum

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Explicit and implicit information needs of people with depression: a qualitative investigation of problems reported on an online depression support forum
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-11-88
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa J Barney, Kathleen M Griffiths, Michelle A Banfield

Abstract

Health management is impeded when consumers do not possess adequate knowledge about their illness. At a public health level, consumer knowledge about depression is particularly important because depression is highly prevalent and causes substantial disability and burden. However, currently little is known about the information needs of people with depression. This study aimed to investigate the explicit and implicit information needs of users of an online depression support forum.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 144 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 19%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 26 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 41 27%
Social Sciences 18 12%
Computer Science 16 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 9%
Arts and Humanities 7 5%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 28 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2017.
All research outputs
#6,212,326
of 23,508,556 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,196
of 4,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,522
of 113,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#4
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,508,556 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,865 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.