↓ Skip to main content

A biofeedback cycling training to improve locomotion: a case series study based on gait pattern classification of 153 chronic stroke patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A biofeedback cycling training to improve locomotion: a case series study based on gait pattern classification of 153 chronic stroke patients
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-8-47
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simona Ferrante, Emilia Ambrosini, Paola Ravelli, Eleonora Guanziroli, Franco Molteni, Giancarlo Ferrigno, Alessandra Pedrocchi

Abstract

The restoration of walking ability is the main goal of post-stroke lower limb rehabilitation and different studies suggest that pedaling may have a positive effect on locomotion. The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of a biofeedback pedaling treatment and its effects on cycling and walking ability in chronic stroke patients. A case series study was designed and participants were recruited based on a gait pattern classification of a population of 153 chronic stroke patients.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ukraine 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 151 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 19%
Student > Master 30 19%
Student > Bachelor 22 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 18 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 44 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 29 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 12%
Sports and Recreations 16 10%
Neuroscience 9 6%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 26 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2015.
All research outputs
#5,294,851
of 6,230,013 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#365
of 419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,430
of 155,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#17
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 6,230,013 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.