↓ Skip to main content

Indigenous utilization of termite mounds and their sustainability in a rice growing village of the central plain of Laos

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Indigenous utilization of termite mounds and their sustainability in a rice growing village of the central plain of Laos
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-7-24
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shuichi Miyagawa, Yusaku Koyama, Mika Kokubo, Yuichi Matsushita, Yoshinao Adachi, Sengdeaune Sivilay, Nobumitsu Kawakubo, Shinya Oba

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the indigenous utilization of termite mounds and termites in a rain-fed rice growing village in the central plain of Laos, where rice production is low and varies year-to-year, and to assess the possibility of sustainable termite mound utilization in the future. This research was carried out from 2007 to 2009.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Philippines 1 1%
Unknown 69 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 17 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 33%
Environmental Science 13 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 17 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2023.
All research outputs
#6,507,536
of 24,129,125 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#229
of 760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,866
of 126,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,129,125 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.