You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Direct comparison of MRI and X-ray CT technologies for 3D imaging of root systems in soil: potential and challenges for root trait quantification
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-015-0060-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ralf Metzner, Anja Eggert, Dagmar van Dusschoten, Daniel Pflugfelder, Stefan Gerth, Ulrich Schurr, Norman Uhlmann, Siegfried Jahnke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 33% |
| United States | 3 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 256 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 71 | 27% |
| Researcher | 51 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 38 | 15% |
| Unknown | 40 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 125 | 48% |
| Engineering | 17 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 11% |
| Unknown | 58 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,102,965
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#217
of 1,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,364
of 274,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.