↓ Skip to main content

Complications and management of acute copper sulphate poisoning; a case discussion

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 411)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Complications and management of acute copper sulphate poisoning; a case discussion
Published in
Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1745-6673-6-34
Pubmed ID
Authors

Champika SSK Gamakaranage, Chaturaka Rodrigo, Sajitha Weerasinghe, Ariaranee Gnanathasan, Visvalingam Puvanaraj, Harshani Fernando

Abstract

Copper sulphate ingestion (accidental or deliberate) is a rare form of poisoning usually limited to the Indian subcontinent. Though the rates are on the decline, it is essential that physicians are aware of its lethal complications and management strategies. The main complications of copper sulphate ingestion include intravascular haemolysis, methaemoglobinaemia, acute kidney injury and rhabdomyolysis. The lethal dose can be as small as 10 grams. We have explored the complications of acute copper sulphate poisoning with examples from two case presentations. We also recommend measures for prevention of such events.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Master 6 10%
Other 3 5%
Researcher 3 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 3%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 29 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 9%
Environmental Science 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Chemistry 2 3%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 30 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,374,670
of 24,682,395 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
#26
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,106
of 252,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,682,395 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.