You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of three rapid diagnostic tests for the detection of human infections with Plasmodium knowlesi
|
---|---|
Published in |
Malaria Journal, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-13-60 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Deshka Foster, Janet Cox-Singh, Dayang SA Mohamad, Sanjeev Krishna, Pek P Chin, Balbir Singh |
Abstract |
Plasmodium knowlesi, a malaria parasite of Southeast Asian macaques, infects humans and can cause fatal malaria. It is difficult to diagnose by microscopy because of morphological similarity to Plasmodium malariae. Nested PCR assay is the most accurate method to distinguish P. knowlesi from other Plasmodium species but is not cost effective in resource-poor settings. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are recommended for settings where malaria is prevalent. In this study, the effectiveness of three RDTs in detecting P. knowlesi from fresh and frozen patient blood samples was evaluated. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 135 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 29 | 21% |
Researcher | 17 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 10% |
Other | 6 | 4% |
Other | 23 | 17% |
Unknown | 32 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 29% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 15% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 14% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 7% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 2% |
Other | 12 | 9% |
Unknown | 33 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2020.
All research outputs
#6,396,982
of 23,924,386 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,679
of 5,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,190
of 227,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#32
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,924,386 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.