You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Guideline Implementability Decision Excellence Model (GUIDE-M): a mixed methods approach to create an international resource to advance the practice guideline field
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-015-0225-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melissa C Brouwers, Julie Makarski, Monika Kastner, Leigh Hayden, Onil Bhattacharyya |
| Abstract |
Practice guideline (PG) implementability refers to PG features that promote their use. While there are tools and resources to promote PG implementability, none are based on an evidence-informed and multidisciplinary perspective. Our objectives were to (i) create a comprehensive and evidence-informed model of PG implementability, (ii) seek support for the model from the international PG community, (iii) map existing implementability tools on to the model, (iv) prioritize areas for further investigation, and (v) describe how the model can be used by PG developers, users, and researchers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 15 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 10% |
| Canada | 3 | 6% |
| Mexico | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 4% |
| Grenada | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 15 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 49% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 15 | 29% |
| Scientists | 10 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 140 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 25% |
| Unknown | 24 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 25% |
| Psychology | 18 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 19% |
| Unknown | 33 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,023,085
of 25,311,095 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#155
of 1,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,766
of 268,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#7
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,311,095 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.