You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
State of the art review: the data revolution in critical care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-015-0801-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marzyeh Ghassemi, Leo Anthony Celi, David J Stone |
| Abstract |
This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2015 and co-published as a series in Critical Care. Other articles in the series can be found online at http://ccforum.com/series/annualupdate2015 . Further information about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from http://www.springer.com/series/8901 . |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| Puerto Rico | 2 | 5% |
| India | 2 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 5% |
| Belgium | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 18% |
| Unknown | 15 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 52% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 20% |
| Scientists | 9 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Qatar | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 234 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 43 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 16% |
| Researcher | 37 | 15% |
| Other | 31 | 13% |
| Professor | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 43 | 18% |
| Unknown | 37 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 90 | 37% |
| Computer Science | 37 | 15% |
| Engineering | 20 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 39 | 16% |
| Unknown | 43 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,247,536
of 23,510,717 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,111
of 6,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,478
of 390,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#94
of 550 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,510,717 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 550 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.