You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Update on the role of extracorporeal CO2 removal as an adjunct to mechanical ventilation in ARDS
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, December 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13054-015-0799-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Philippe Morimont, Andriy Batchinsky, Bernard Lambermont |
Abstract |
This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2015 and co-published as a series in Critical Care. Other articles in the series can be found online at http://ccforum.com/series/annualupdate2015 . Further information about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from http://www.springer.com/series/8901 . |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 21% |
Spain | 4 | 14% |
Canada | 3 | 10% |
Puerto Rico | 2 | 7% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Italy | 1 | 3% |
Sweden | 1 | 3% |
Greece | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 7 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18 | 62% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 17% |
Scientists | 3 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 2 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 84 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 18 | 21% |
Other | 14 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
Other | 20 | 23% |
Unknown | 13 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 64% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
Engineering | 3 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Unknown | 18 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2017.
All research outputs
#1,732,014
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,529
of 6,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,363
of 395,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#107
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.