↓ Skip to main content

Lower birth weight and increased body fat at school age in children prenatally exposed to modern pesticides: a prospective study

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Health, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lower birth weight and increased body fat at school age in children prenatally exposed to modern pesticides: a prospective study
Published in
Environmental Health, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1476-069x-10-79
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine Wohlfahrt-Veje, Katharina M Main, Ida M Schmidt, Malene Boas, Tina K Jensen, Philippe Grandjean, Niels E Skakkebæk, Helle R Andersen

Abstract

Endocrine disrupting chemicals have been hypothesized to play a role in the obesity epidemic. Long-term effects of prenatal exposure to non-persistent pesticides on body composition have so far not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to assess possible effects of prenatal exposure to currently used pesticides on children's growth, endocrine and reproductive function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Unknown 150 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Researcher 18 12%
Other 9 6%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 39 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 11%
Environmental Science 14 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 45 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2014.
All research outputs
#3,243,094
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Health
#538
of 1,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,450
of 130,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Health
#12
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,477 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.