You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
HLAreporter: a tool for HLA typing from next generation sequencing data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Medicine, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13073-015-0145-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yazhi Huang, Jing Yang, Dingge Ying, Yan Zhang, Vorasuk Shotelersuk, Nattiya Hirankarn, Pak Chung Sham, Yu Lung Lau, Wanling Yang |
| Abstract |
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing from next generation sequencing (NGS) data has the potential for widespread applications. Here we introduce a novel tool (HLAreporter) for HLA typing from NGS data based on read-mapping using a comprehensive reference panel containing all known HLA alleles, followed by de novo assembly of the gene-specific short reads. Accurate HLA typing at high-digit resolution was achieved when it was tested on publicly available NGS data, outperforming other newly developed tools such as HLAminer and PHLAT. HLAreporter can be downloaded from http://paed.hku.hk/genome/. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Mexico | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 62% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 31% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 119 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 21 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 22% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 27 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,609,536
of 24,462,749 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#596
of 1,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,177
of 266,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#10
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,462,749 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,763 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.