↓ Skip to main content

Extracorporeal gas exchange for acute respiratory failure in adult patients: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extracorporeal gas exchange for acute respiratory failure in adult patients: a systematic review
Published in
Critical Care, December 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13054-015-0806-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthieu Schmidt, Carol Hodgson, Alain Combes

Abstract

This article is one of ten reviews selected from the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2015 and co-published as a series in Critical Care. Other articles in the series can be found online at http://ccforum.com/series/annualupdate2015 . Further information about the Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine is available from http://www.springer.com/series/8901 .

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 107 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 16%
Other 16 14%
Student > Postgraduate 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 12%
Student > Master 6 5%
Other 26 23%
Unknown 19 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 66%
Engineering 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 23 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2016.
All research outputs
#1,405,395
of 17,061,645 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,359
of 5,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,133
of 267,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,061,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.