↓ Skip to main content

Cerebrospinal fluid lactate concentration to distinguish bacterial from aseptic meningitis: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
173 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cerebrospinal fluid lactate concentration to distinguish bacterial from aseptic meningitis: a systemic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Critical Care, December 2010
DOI 10.1186/cc9395
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nguyen T Huy, Nguyen TH Thao, Doan TN Diep, Mihoko Kikuchi, Javier Zamora, Kenji Hirayama

Abstract

Making a differential diagnosis between bacterial meningitis and aseptic meningitis is a critical clinical problem. The utility of a cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) lactate assay for this purpose has been debated and is not yet routinely clinically performed. To adequately evaluate this assay, a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies of the CSF lactate concentration as a marker for both bacterial meningitis and aseptic meningitis was performed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 1%
Canada 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 224 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 32 14%
Researcher 29 12%
Other 25 11%
Student > Master 24 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 8%
Other 57 24%
Unknown 49 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 131 56%
Neuroscience 10 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 <1%
Other 15 6%
Unknown 60 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,356,343
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,042
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,477
of 190,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#25
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.