You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Osteopathic manipulative treatment and pain in preterms: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13063-015-0615-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Francesco Cerritelli, Luca Cicchitti, Marta Martelli, Gina Barlafante, Cinzia Renzetti, Gianfranco Pizzolorusso, Mariacristina Lupacchini, Marianna D’Orazio, Benedetta Marinelli, Vincenzo Cozzolino, Paola Fusilli, Carmine D’Incecco |
| Abstract |
Recent evidence proved the necessity to improve health care and pain management in newborns. Osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) has been largely used to treat painful syndromes as well as term and preterm newborns. Recent studies have demonstrated positive results of osteopathy in reducing length of stay and costs. However, no trials were carried out on pain in newborns. The aim of the present clinical trial is to explore the effectiveness of osteopathic treatment in reducing pain in a sample of preterms. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 183 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 15% |
| Researcher | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 19% |
| Unknown | 50 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 22% |
| Psychology | 7 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 59 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2020.
All research outputs
#12,725,419
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#2,906
of 5,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,700
of 258,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#54
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,843 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.