↓ Skip to main content

Usability and knowledge testing of educational tools about infant vaccination pain management directed to postnatal nurses

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Usability and knowledge testing of educational tools about infant vaccination pain management directed to postnatal nurses
Published in
BMC Medical Education, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12909-015-0305-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Taddio, Vibhuti Shah, Jane Wang, Chaitya Parikh, Sarah Smart, Moshe Ipp, Rebecca Pillai Riddell, Linda S Franck

Abstract

Adapting educational tools to meet user needs is a critical aspect of translating research evidence into best clinical practices. The objectives of this study were to evaluate usability and effectiveness of educational tools about infant vaccination pain management directed to postnatal nurses.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Unknown 81 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Other 18 22%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 24 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 19%
Psychology 6 7%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Computer Science 3 4%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 17 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2016.
All research outputs
#3,677,102
of 7,540,906 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#751
of 1,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,114
of 206,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#34
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,540,906 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,165 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.