↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Dissecting microbial community structure and methane-producing pathways of a full-scale anaerobic reactor digesting activated sludge from wastewater treatment by metagenomic sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Cell Factories, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
294 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
460 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dissecting microbial community structure and methane-producing pathways of a full-scale anaerobic reactor digesting activated sludge from wastewater treatment by metagenomic sequencing
Published in
Microbial Cell Factories, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12934-015-0218-4
Pubmed ID
25776983
Authors

Jianhua Guo, Yongzhen Peng, Bing-Jie Ni, Xiaoyu Han, Lu Fan, Zhiguo Yuan

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion has been widely applied to treat the waste activated sludge from biological wastewater treatment and produce methane for biofuel, which has been one of the most efficient solutions to both energy crisis and environmental pollution challenges. Anaerobic digestion sludge contains highly complex microbial communities, which play crucial roles in sludge treatment. However, traditional approaches based on 16S rRNA amplification or fluorescent in situ hybridization cannot completely reveal the whole microbial community structure due to the extremely high complexity of the involved communities. In this sense, the next-generation high-throughput sequencing provides a powerful tool for dissecting microbial community structure and methane-producing pathways in anaerobic digestion.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 460 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 450 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 101 22%
Student > Master 62 13%
Researcher 50 11%
Student > Bachelor 48 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 41 9%
Other 76 17%
Unknown 82 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 77 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 15%
Engineering 66 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 9%
Chemical Engineering 18 4%
Other 65 14%
Unknown 125 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2016.
All research outputs
#13,430,633
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Cell Factories
#816
of 1,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,791
of 261,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Cell Factories
#16
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,598 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.