↓ Skip to main content

Clinico-pathologic spectrum of C3 glomerulopathy-an Indian experience

Overview of attention for article published in Diagnostic Pathology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinico-pathologic spectrum of C3 glomerulopathy-an Indian experience
Published in
Diagnostic Pathology, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13000-015-0233-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ganesh Kumar Viswanathan, Ritambhra Nada, Ashwani Kumar, Raja Ramachandran, Charan Singh Rayat, Vivekanand Jha, Vinay Sakhuja, Kusum Joshi

Abstract

C3 glomerulopathy (C3GP) is characterized by deposition of complement C3 with absence/traces of immunoglobulins in the glomeruli and categorized into dense deposit disease (DDD), C3 glomerulonephritis (C3GN), complement factor H related protein 5(CFHR5) nephropathy etc. Collaborative efforts of pathologists, complement biologists and nephrologists worldwide are expanding the histomorphological pattern and laboratory findings related to C3GP. Hence, we studied point prevalence and morphological spectrum of C3GP in Indian patients to correlate morphological patterns with standard therapies and outcome of the patients. Retrospective analysis of renal biopsies (2007-2012,n-4565), which on immunofluorescence (IF) had C3 dominant deposits with absence or trace amount of immunoglobulin was carried out. Histopathology and electronmicroscopy (EM) were reviewed; cases were re-classified as DDD and C3GN. Histomorphological patterns of both groups were compared and correlated with treatment. Clinical details and follow up of patients were retrieved from the department of nephrology. There were 31 cases (0.7%) of C3GP sub-classified as DDD (n-13) and C3GN (n-14). It was difficult to sub-classify 4 cases since EM showed overlapping features. C3GN and DDD had distinct clinical characteristics and disease outcome, though pathological features were overlapping. Majority of C3GP patients were males and were in 2(nd) to 4(th) decade of life. Nephrotic syndrome in DDD and nephritic-nephrotic presentation in C3GN patients was more common. Hypertension and oliguria were more often observed in C3GN than DDD. Membranoproliferative pattern (MPGN) was commonest pattern in DDD; other patterns seen were mesangial proliferative, mesangial expansive/nodular, exudative and crescentic. C3GN also had all the above patterns, the predominant ones being MPGN and mesangial proliferative. Limited follow-up revealed response to therapy only in C3GN (33%). Progression to ESRD was 33% in DDD and 10% cases in C3GN. C3GP comprise 0.7% of all renal biopsies. MPGN pattern was the commonest morphological pattern in DDD whereas MPGN and mesangial proliferative pattern were equally dominant patterns in C3GN. EM of 4 cases (13%) showed intermediate features. Evaluation of alternate complement pathway must be done in all cases to identify the point of dysregulated alternate complement pathway and to confirm the diagnosis in ambiguous cases. The virtual slides for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/1730070964135632.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 17%
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 6 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 60%
Psychology 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,768,828
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#79
of 1,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,301
of 286,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#5
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,125 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.