↓ Skip to main content

Dehydroepiandrosterone decreases the age-related decline of the in vitro fertilization outcome in women younger than 40 years old

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dehydroepiandrosterone decreases the age-related decline of the in vitro fertilization outcome in women younger than 40 years old
Published in
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12958-015-0014-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Massimo Tartagni, Maria V Cicinelli, Domenico Baldini, Mario V Tartagni, Hala Alrasheed, Maria A DeSalvia, Giuseppe Loverro, Monica Montagnani

Abstract

With infertility populations rapidly aging, treatments improving pregnancy chances assume increasing clinical importance. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) has been reported to improve pregnancy rates and lower miscarriage rates in women with diminished ovarian function. This study was planned to evaluate whether pretreatment with DHEA may improve in vitro fertilization (IVF) parameters and pregnancy outcomes in infertile women with advanced reproductive age and normal ovarian reserve.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 21%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Other 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 16 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 21 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2017.
All research outputs
#6,032,773
of 24,348,815 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#221
of 1,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,723
of 263,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#3
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,348,815 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.