↓ Skip to main content

Hybridization and massive mtDNA unidirectional introgression between the closely related Neotropical toads Rhinella marina and R. schneideriinferred from mtDNA and nuclear markers

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hybridization and massive mtDNA unidirectional introgression between the closely related Neotropical toads Rhinella marina and R. schneideriinferred from mtDNA and nuclear markers
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, September 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-11-264
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernando Sequeira, Davidson Sodré, Nuno Ferrand, José AR Bernardi, Iracilda Sampaio, Horacio Schneider, Marcelo Vallinoto

Abstract

The classical perspective that interspecific hybridization in animals is rare has been changing due to a growing list of empirical examples showing the occurrence of gene flow between closely related species. Using sequence data from cyt b mitochondrial gene and three intron nuclear genes (RPL9, c-myc, and RPL3) we investigated patterns of nucleotide polymorphism and divergence between two closely related toad species R. marina and R. schneideri. By comparing levels of differentiation at nuclear and mtDNA levels we were able to describe patterns of introgression and infer the history of hybridization between these species.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Cuba 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 163 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 25%
Researcher 28 16%
Student > Master 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 23 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 18 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 121 69%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 11%
Environmental Science 4 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 1%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 23 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2011.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#3,267
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,347
of 141,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#55
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.